Jump to section
What is constructive criticism?
Constructive criticism vs. destructive criticism
Benefits of constructive criticism
How to give constructive criticism
10 tips for giving constructive criticism
For Business
Products
Build leaders that accelerate team performance and engagement.
Drive productivity through sustained well-being and mental health for all employees with BetterUp Care™.
Solutions
Transform your business, starting with your sales leaders.
Foster a culture of inclusion and belonging.
Customers
See how innovative companies use BetterUp to build a thriving workforce.
Resources
Best practices, research, and tools to fuel individual and business growth.
View on-demand BetterUp events and learn about upcoming live discussions.
The latest insights and ideas for building a high-performing workplace.
Innovative research featured in peer-reviewed journals, press, and more.
Jump to section
What is constructive criticism?
Constructive criticism vs. destructive criticism
Benefits of constructive criticism
How to give constructive criticism
10 tips for giving constructive criticism
Let’s face it, it can be hard to give or receive criticism no matter how it is delivered. But getting comfortable with offering and receiving practical, constructive criticism is fundamental to our professional development.
When presented correctly, it can be a helpful tool for leaders and peers to help each other deliver better results, find motivation, and strengthen relationships.
So how can you learn to take criticism well and get better at delivering it to others?
In this article, we'll discuss the art of constructive criticism. We’ll break down what it is, how it compares to destructive criticism, practical strategies to give and receive it well, and what to avoid in both cases.
Constructive criticism is a feedback method that offers specific, actionable recommendations. Good constructive feedback facilitates positive outcomes and creates a positive working environment. It also provides a safe space where a person feels secure enough to ask questions, seek help, and share ideas.
The big difference between constructive and destructive criticism lies in how the comments are delivered.
While constructive criticism focuses on building up the other person, destructive criticism focuses on the negative. The feedback can be vague and often lacks guidance or support.
Constructive criticism is clear, direct, honest, and easy to implement. It provides specific examples and actionable suggestions for positive change. This type of feedback also highlights ways the recipient can make positive improvements in their behavior to minimize future problems.
Destructive criticism, on the other hand, focuses solely on the problem. This kind of feedback offers no encouragement, help, or support for improvement. Despite the deliverer’s intentions, it often lowers morale and reduces confidence.
Unlike deconstructive or negative criticism, constructive criticism builds trust and provides an opportunity for both parties to grow. Two key elements of constructive criticism’s success are context and actionable advice.
This kind of feedback gives the recipient context around their areas of improvement, which is crucial for understanding why the feedback is being offered.
Supporting the additional context with actionable steps and suggestions for how to improve build trust between both parties. This combination also opens the door to conversation, collaboration, and professional development.
But there is more to effective negative feedback than expressing a negative in a positive light. The key to success is to make your feedback sound encouraging and to keep the other person’s perspective in mind.
By remaining empathetic to their circumstances, you’ll have an easier time delivering critical feedback in a beneficial and constructive way.
This popular method of giving constructive criticism is often used in Toastmasters and the corporate environment.
The “feedback sandwich” got its name because of its structure. You wedge your criticism between an opening and an ending (like a burger wedged between two buns) using the PIP analogy, which stands for Positive-Improvement-Positive.
With PIP, you can break down your feedback into three segments.
Example:
“I liked the depth of content you covered in your presentation. However, you can improve the design and color palette of your slides. The ones you used were a bit hard to process and didn’t do justice to your content.
Having said that, I really like the overall flow and feel of it. With a few tweaks in the areas I’ve mentioned, I think you have a winner. Please reach out to the design team for some tips, and they will help you take things to the next level. I’m excited to see the end product!”
Segment 1: Open with positive feedback
Start by focusing on the recipient’s strengths and highlight what you like about what they have done.
Example: “I liked the depth of content you covered in your presentation.”
Segment 2: Sandwich the area of improvement in the middle
Provide the criticism by focusing on what they need to improve on.
Example: “However you can improve the design and color palette of your slides. The ones you used were a bit hard to process and didn’t do justice to your content.”
Segment 3: End on a positive note
Finally, round off the feedback with an encouraging comment that reiterates the positive statement you made at the start. Also, highlight the positive results they can expect if they accept your critique as it helps build trust and confidence.
Example: “Having said that, I really like the overall flow and feel of it. With a few tweaks in the areas I’ve mentioned, I think you have a winner. Please reach out to the design team for some tips, and they will help you take things to the next level. I’m excited to see the end product!”
The more specific and detailed your feedback is, the more actionable it will be. Do not make vague, blanket statements. Instead, list out objections or behavior changes you want to see in detail. This step makes it easier for the other person to address and change things.
Here is an example of vague vs. specific feedback:
The vague comment is very broad and confusing because marketing is a very general topic. In contrast, the specific comment provides clarity and makes the task more actionable because it is so precise.
Using this approach provides employees and peers clarity. The better they understand the request, the less uncertain or anxious they will feel about the job and how they should complete it.
The main reason for giving feedback is to help the person improve. Remember, good feedback is a gift!
Giving recommendations on what the person can do to improve has a range of benefits, including the following:
It will also help them act on what you have discussed rather than procrastinate.
Example:
The first recommendation is not very helpful because it lacks clarity and specificity. The second example is better because it is very specific and demonstrates your point of view to the person by explaining your rationale.
Give recommendations only when you know the facts about that specific topic or person. Avoid any temptation to jump to conclusions and observe instead.
Wrong assumptions can come across as personal attacks, and they can cause distress in the workplace.
Example:
This assumption is not necessarily true. Experienced presenters can be nervous when facilitating workshops, especially when presenting in a new environment and to a new audience.
For example, assuming that someone is inexperienced just because they appear slightly hesitant can hurt morale and reduce psychological security in the workplace.
It is also counter-productive as the feedback recipient would likely discount any criticism that followed even if it was accurate.
When the tables turn, and you’re the one on the receiving end of criticism, how do you cope with the situation?
Do you know how to accept the feedback and back off the defensive?
Receiving criticism from a co-worker, a colleague, or someone you don’t fully trust can be challenging. However, it is helpful to remember that accurate and constructive feedback can also come from flawed sources.
Here is a 6-step process on how to receive criticism with tact and grace:
Request time to follow up. If it’s a more significant issue, ask for a follow-up meeting to ask more questions and agree on the next steps.
This pause will also give you time to process the feedback, seek advice from others and think about solutions. Ideally, you’ll also articulate what you will do in the future and thank the person again for the feedback.
If you are on the receiving end of constructive criticism, don’t throw it away. Insight from a trusted, objective source about your work, management style, or how you’re showing up is priceless.
You want to keep it coming, and that means not reacting in a way that scares the giver off or makes them less willing to give you feedback in the future.
To keep the feedback coming, avoid these 5 reactions:
Remember, it’s not easy to give or receive feedback, but we hope that this article has equipped you with the tools to feel more positive in your ability to do this well.
If you’re looking for more support, get in touch to see how a BetterUp coach can help you find your voice and manage your responses to constructive feedback.
BetterUp Fellow Coach
Products
Solutions
Customers